The Evolution of HR (Employee
Engagement Insights from a Successful Job Search III)
How Progressive
Leaders Are Thinking about HR Strategy
http://www.totaltrainingsolutions.com/ |
I was fortunate in the course of my recent job search to
interview with business leaders from Human Resources, Marketing and
Communications, Operations and other business functions in a wide variety of
industries including transportation, technology, healthcare, business services
and more. Although I did not transcribe
these interviews for research purposes, I wish I could have: not surprisingly,
many leaders are asking the same smart questions about how employee engagement
– and, human resources more broadly – can really be turned into better business
results.
Based on my conversations, I believe that a version of this
question is, in fact, at the heart of every progressive HR leader’s agenda:
specifically, “How can I align my organization’s people strategy with business
strategy to improve performance?”
Isn’t this the same question HR leaders have been asking? Yes
and no. Progressive HR leaders have always sought to contribute business value,
but undoubtedly the way in which we approach the partnership between HR and the
business has evolved rapidly in recent years.
Remember when the most celebrated CHROs (Chief HR Officers) were those
who were able to outsource and down-skill to save corporations money? Or those
who signed the biggest contracts to implement HRIS systems? While efficiency
and standardization are still important, the conversation today is
fundamentally about how HR practices enable people and organizations to win.
Below are three trends I observe in how smart and successful
HR leaders approach their jobs.
- HR strategy is inseparable from business strategy. People are at the core of how work gets done in even the most automated of work environments, because people are making decisions, every day, at every level. Progressive HR leaders work closely with business leadership not only to understand how people can help a business achieve a certain set of results, but also how a business can exceed its goals through well-led people-practices like talent development, executive compensation, recruiting and employee engagement.
- HR strategy is really strategic. What I mean by this is, progressive HR leaders aren’t just re-labeling tactical plans as “strategies” then continuing to do what they have always done (although some less progressive HR leaders are). The best CHROs are: looking at the long-term objectives of the business and articulating where the workforce needs to be in 3-5 years to achieve them (= drawing a compelling vision), putting intelligent and adaptable plans in place to get from here to there (= laying out a strategy), and empowering their people to start constructing the path to the future (= executing).
- HR strategy is a single strategy. The most important and challenging insight I garnered from my conversations is that going forward, HR must view itself as a single function in order to deliver the level of value businesses need to sustain competitive differentiation. While the brightest HR executives are leading the charge to make this so, not everyone is willing or able to follow. As a result, HR practices are largely approached as silos or loosely-coordinated activities instead of different strands of the same DNA, resulting in inefficient or mis-aligned programs.
These trends have huge implications for HR and the
businesses they belong too: they require fundamental changes in the who, what,
when, where, why and how of work getting done. Of course, people in the HR game
haven’t been talking about HR transformation for a while – what I am reporting
is less different in character than
different in degree from the HR transformation conversation to date. The good news is, there is real opportunity. Companies that do this well (or partner to do this well) will win. And if anyone can figure out how to build
better organizations, it is progressive HR teams!
3 comments:
Hazen- your last comment regarding strategy is a little confusing. are you saying HR strategy should be single in the sense that there should not be multiple HR strategies siloed by, say, functional area? but rather have a single HR strategy encompassing all area? Of which I agree, but i think we need to be more encompassing and say that HR strategy must be a subset of, and integrated with the larger organizational strategy. Maybe that is a given, but i think it is worth calling out that when we say single strategy, it is the single strategy for the organization, not just for HR (although I realize that is your focus). Hope all well.
Amazing Blog! SOS is an digital employee engagement platform that offers fun, interactive Online employee engagement activities and games you can play with office colleagues online and remotely.
Post a Comment